Nomensa vs Excited: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Excited (4.6/5) edges ahead of Nomensa (3.9/5) overall. Excited is the better choice for SaaS/fintech teams, Clutch-ranked, accessible rates. Nomensa is the stronger option for Government, banking, healthcare — accessibility built in. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Nomensa vs Excited: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Nomensa | Excited |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2001 | 2018 |
| HQ | Bristol, UK (also London and Amsterdam) | Lviv, Ukraine |
| Team size | 100+ | 100+ |
| Rating | 3.9 / 5 | 4.6 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Built around accessibility and psychology-informed UX from its 2001 founding, now one of Europe's largest specialist UX agencies at 100+ people | A sustained Top 5 global UX company ranking on Clutch, with about 70% of reviews specifically citing quality and creativity |
| Pricing model | Project-based (not published) | Fixed project, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not published | $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, Sketch, Adobe Creative Suite | Figma, Framer, After Effects |
| Industries served | Financial services / fintech, Healthcare, EdTech | SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech |
Nomensa vs Excited: overview
Nomensa
Simon Norris, Sally Lincoln, and Alastair Campbell founded Nomensa in 2001 around a specific combination: psychology, user-centered design, and accessibility. Now running from Bristol, London, and Amsterdam with 100+ people, the company calls itself one of Europe's largest specialist UX agencies, serving banking, e-commerce, education, entertainment, government, and healthcare clients. Accessibility isn't an add-on service here — auditing, testing, training, and consultancy sit alongside standard UX design work.
Excited
Excited opened in Lviv, Ukraine in 2018 and has grown to 100+ designers while holding a repeated spot among Clutch's Top 5 UX companies globally. Around 70% of its Clutch reviewers specifically name quality and creativity — an unusually direct signal in review data most companies don't get. The company narrows deliberately to SaaS and fintech, covering UX/UI, product design, branding, and motion design, with delivery experience across 20+ countries.
Services and capabilities: Nomensa vs Excited
| Capability | Nomensa | Excited |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✓ | ✓ |
| Branding | ✓ | ✓ |
| Web development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Mobile development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Nomensa vs Excited
| Framework / platform | Nomensa | Excited |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | N/A | N/A |
| React | N/A | N/A |
| Framer | N/A | ✓ |
| Adobe Creative Suite | ✓ | ✓ |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | N/A |
| After Effects | N/A | ✓ |
Pricing comparison: Nomensa vs Excited
| Criterion | Nomensa | Excited |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Retainer | Fixed project, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Nomensa vs Excited
| Dimension | Nomensa | Excited |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Financial services / fintech, Healthcare, EdTech | SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech |
| Best use cases | Government or public-sector digital accessibility compliance, Banking or healthcare UX requiring built-in accessibility auditing | SaaS product redesign for a growth-stage company, Fintech UX/UI overhaul with motion design polish |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Nomensa vs Excited: pros and cons
| Nomensa | |
|---|---|
| + | Accessibility expertise built into the practice since 2001, not added later as a compliance afterthought |
| + | 100+ people across Bristol, London, and Amsterdam is a genuinely large specialist UX team |
| + | Serves banking, e-commerce, education, government, and healthcare — sectors where accessibility compliance matters most |
| + | Independently founded and still operating under its original leadership focus |
| - | Accessibility-and-psychology specialization may be a narrower fit for clients whose priority is pure visual design |
| - | Pricing and minimum engagement size aren't published |
| - | European office footprint (Bristol, London, Amsterdam) offers less overlap with US or APAC business hours |
| Excited | |
|---|---|
| + | Sustained Top 5 UX company ranking worldwide by Clutch, not a one-off placement |
| + | About 70% of Clutch reviewers specifically cite quality and creativity, a strong qualitative signal |
| + | Purpose-built around SaaS and fintech, giving real vertical depth |
| + | Delivery experience across 20+ countries demonstrates broad operational reach |
| - | The claimed 15M+ user reach figure is self-reported and independently unverifiable |
| - | Ukraine-based team carries the same regional-continuity considerations as other Ukraine-rooted companies |
| - | SaaS/fintech specialization means less fit outside those two verticals |
Who should choose Nomensa?
A typical fit: government or public-sector digital accessibility compliance.
Built around accessibility and psychology-informed UX from its 2001 founding, now one of Europe's largest specialist UX agencies at 100+ people. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Financial services / fintech, Healthcare, EdTech.
Who should choose Excited?
A typical fit: SaaS product redesign for a growth-stage company.
A sustained Top 5 global UX company ranking on Clutch, with about 70% of reviews specifically citing quality and creativity. Minimum engagement starts at $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech.
Decision matrix: Nomensa vs Excited
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Nomensa |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Excited |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Nomensa (Not published) vs Excited ($20K (per company website; independently unverifiable)) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Nomensa |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Nomensa vs Excited
| Use case | Nomensa fit | Excited fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Government or public-sector digital accessibility compliance | Strong | Limited | Nomensa |
| Banking or healthcare UX requiring built-in accessibility auditing | Strong | Limited | Nomensa |
| SaaS product redesign for a growth-stage company | Limited | Strong | Excited |
| Fintech UX/UI overhaul with motion design polish | Limited | Strong | Excited |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Nomensa vs Excited
Excited (4.6/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. A sustained Top 5 global UX company ranking on Clutch, with about 70% of reviews specifically citing quality and creativity.
Nomensa (3.9/5) is worth a look if you need banking or healthcare UX requiring built-in accessibility auditing. If your situation matches that, Nomensa is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Nomensa vs Excited FAQ
Is Nomensa better than Excited?
Excited (4.6/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Nomensa's strongest advantage: accessibility expertise built into the practice since 2001, not added later as a compliance afterthought. Excited's strongest advantage: sustained Top 5 UX company ranking worldwide by Clutch, not a one-off placement.
How do Nomensa and Excited differ in pricing?
Nomensa uses project-based (not published) pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Excited uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Nomensa or Excited?
Nomensa is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Nomensa and Excited?
Nomensa's primary differentiator is: built around accessibility and psychology-informed UX from its 2001 founding, now one of Europe's largest specialist UX agencies at 100+ people. Excited's primary differentiator is: a sustained Top 5 global UX company ranking on Clutch, with about 70% of reviews specifically citing quality and creativity. They also differ in team size (100+ vs 100+), minimum engagement (Not published vs $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (Financial services / fintech, Healthcare vs SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.