Excited vs Topflight Apps: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Excited (4.6/5) edges ahead of Topflight Apps (3.9/5) overall. Excited is the better choice for saaS and fintech product teams wanting a Clutch Top-5 specialist without enterprise-agency rates.. Topflight Apps is the stronger option for healthcare, fintech, and AI startups preferring a monthly subscription over a large fixed-price contract.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Excited vs Topflight Apps: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Excited | Topflight Apps |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2018 | 2016 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine | Irvine, CA, USA |
| Team size | 100+ | ~40 (some directories list 51–200; likely inflated bracket) |
| Rating | 4.6 / 5 | 3.9 / 5 |
| Best for | SaaS and fintech product teams wanting a Clutch Top-5 specialist without enterprise-agency rates. | Healthcare, fintech, and AI startups preferring a monthly subscription over a large fixed-price contract. |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, dedicated team | Monthly subscription / dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) | $8K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, Framer, After Effects | Figma, React, Swift |
| Industries served | SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech | Healthcare, Financial services / fintech |
Excited vs Topflight Apps: overview
Excited
Excited started in 2018 out of Lviv, Ukraine and has grown to 100+ designers, with Clutch consistently ranking it among the Top 5 UX companies globally — roughly 70% of its reviewers cite quality and creativity by name. Its work covers UX/UI, product design, branding, and motion design, aimed squarely at SaaS and fintech, with delivery across 20+ countries and a self-reported reach of 15M+ product users (per company; independently unverifiable exact reach figure).
Topflight Apps
Joe Tuan founded Topflight Apps in 2016; it's based in Irvine, California, focused on healthcare, fintech, and AI app design and development for both Fortune 500 and startup clients. The company states a team of roughly 40, though some directories list 51–200 (treated as a likely inflated bracket). Its monthly-subscription engagement model is a genuine differentiator from the fixed-price or T&M norm found across most of this list.
Services and capabilities: Excited vs Topflight Apps
| Capability | Excited | Topflight Apps |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✓ | ✗ |
| Branding | ✓ | ✗ |
| Web development | ✗ | ✓ |
| Mobile development | ✗ | ✓ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Excited vs Topflight Apps
| Framework / platform | Excited | Topflight Apps |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | N/A | N/A |
| React | N/A | ✓ |
| Framer | ✓ | N/A |
| Adobe Creative Suite | ✓ | N/A |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | N/A |
| After Effects | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Excited vs Topflight Apps
| Criterion | Excited | Topflight Apps |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) | $8K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team | Subscription, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Accessible | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Excited vs Topflight Apps
| Dimension | Excited | Topflight Apps |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech | Healthcare, Financial services / fintech |
| Best use cases | SaaS product redesign for a growth-stage company, Fintech UX/UI overhaul with motion design polish | Healthcare app design and AI feature development, Fintech app redesign on an ongoing subscription basis |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Subscription |
Excited vs Topflight Apps: pros and cons
| Excited | |
|---|---|
| + | Repeated Top 5 UX company ranking worldwide by Clutch, not a one-off placement |
| + | Roughly 70% of Clutch reviewers specifically cite quality/creativity, a strong qualitative signal |
| + | Purpose-built around SaaS and fintech, giving real vertical depth |
| + | Delivery experience across 20+ countries demonstrates broad operational reach |
| - | The 15M+ user reach figure is self-reported and independently unverifiable |
| - | Ukraine-based team carries the same regional-continuity considerations as other Ukraine-rooted companies |
| - | SaaS/fintech specialization means less fit outside those two verticals |
| Topflight Apps | |
|---|---|
| + | Subscription pricing gives more budget predictability than a fixed-scope contract for an evolving product |
| + | Focused specifically on healthcare, fintech, and AI — three compliance-heavy verticals |
| + | Serves both Fortune 500 and startup clients, offering flexible scale |
| + | Nearly a decade of continuous operation under its founding CEO |
| - | Reported team size is inconsistent across sources (company states ~40; some directories list 51–200, likely inflated) |
| - | Heavy AI-development emphasis may be a weaker fit for clients purely focused on visual/brand design |
| - | Monthly-subscription pricing can exceed a fixed-scope project's cost for a well-defined, short engagement |
Who should choose Excited?
Excited is the right choice for saaS and fintech product teams wanting a Clutch Top-5 specialist without enterprise-agency rates..
A repeat Clutch Top-5 global UX ranking, with roughly 70% of reviews specifically citing quality and creativity. Minimum engagement starts at $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech.
Who should choose Topflight Apps?
Topflight Apps is the right choice for healthcare, fintech, and AI startups preferring a monthly subscription over a large fixed-price contract..
A monthly-subscription engagement model built specifically around healthcare, fintech, and AI app development. Minimum engagement starts at $8K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in Healthcare, Financial services / fintech.
Decision matrix: Excited vs Topflight Apps
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Excited |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Excited |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Topflight Apps |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Excited |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Excited vs Topflight Apps
| Use case | Excited fit | Topflight Apps fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| SaaS product redesign for a growth-stage company | Strong | Limited | Excited |
| Fintech UX/UI overhaul with motion design polish | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Healthcare app design and AI feature development | Limited | Strong | Topflight Apps |
| Fintech app redesign on an ongoing subscription basis | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Excited vs Topflight Apps
Excited (4.6/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. A repeat Clutch Top-5 global UX ranking, with roughly 70% of reviews specifically citing quality and creativity. It is best for saaS and fintech product teams wanting a Clutch Top-5 specialist without enterprise-agency rates..
Topflight Apps (3.9/5) is the better choice when healthcare, fintech, and AI startups preferring a monthly subscription over a large fixed-price contract.. If your situation matches those criteria, Topflight Apps is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Excited vs Topflight Apps FAQ
Is Excited better than Topflight Apps?
Excited (4.6/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Excited is better for saaS and fintech product teams wanting a Clutch Top-5 specialist without enterprise-agency rates.. Topflight Apps is better for healthcare, fintech, and AI startups preferring a monthly subscription over a large fixed-price contract..
How do Excited and Topflight Apps differ in pricing?
Excited uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Topflight Apps uses monthly subscription / dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $8K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Excited or Topflight Apps?
Topflight Apps is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Excited and Topflight Apps?
Excited's primary differentiator is: a repeat clutch top-5 global ux ranking, with roughly 70% of reviews specifically citing quality and creativity. Topflight Apps's primary differentiator is: a monthly-subscription engagement model built specifically around healthcare, fintech, and ai app development. They also differ in team size (100+ vs ~40 (some directories list 51–200; likely inflated bracket)), minimum engagement ($20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) vs $8K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech vs Healthcare, Financial services / fintech).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.