R/GA vs Ramotion: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Ramotion (4.0/5) edges ahead of R/GA (3.7/5) overall. Ramotion is the better choice for startups and mid-market companies wanting brand identity and product design bundled into one engagement.. R/GA is the stronger option for large consumer or enterprise brands wanting product design bundled with marketing-led brand strategy.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
R/GA vs Ramotion: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | R/GA | Ramotion |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1977 | 2009 |
| HQ | New York City, NY, USA | San Francisco, CA, USA |
| Team size | ~2,000 | 29–70+ (company states 70+ experts; third-party trackers report lower core headcount) |
| Rating | 3.7 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 |
| Best for | Large consumer or enterprise brands wanting product design bundled with marketing-led brand strategy. | Startups and mid-market companies wanting brand identity and product design bundled into one engagement. |
| Pricing model | Project-based, retainer for ongoing programs | Fixed project, T&M |
| Min. engagement | Not published | $25K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, Adobe Creative Suite, After Effects | Figma, Webflow, React |
| Industries served | Enterprise transformation, Consumer products, Media & entertainment | SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products |
R/GA vs Ramotion: overview
R/GA
R/GA has operated out of New York City since 1977 and now spans ten countries, including Austin, London, São Paulo, Singapore, and Stockholm. Twenty-three years inside Interpublic Group ended with an independent buyout in March 2025, backed by private equity firm Truelink Capital — a recent structural shift worth disclosing. Its differentiator is fusing digital product design with marketing and brand strategy for large consumer and enterprise brands.
Ramotion
Ramotion has run out of San Francisco since 2009, with additional offices in Los Angeles and New York. Team size is genuinely contested: the company states '70+ team experts,' while third-party trackers put core headcount as low as ~29 (company states 70+ experts; third-party trackers report lower core headcount) — a gap worth clarifying directly. Its work spans brand identity, UX/UI, and web/mobile app development across a wide client range.
Services and capabilities: R/GA vs Ramotion
| Capability | R/GA | Ramotion |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✓ | ✗ |
| Branding | ✓ | ✓ |
| Web development | ✗ | ✓ |
| Mobile development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: R/GA vs Ramotion
| Framework / platform | R/GA | Ramotion |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | N/A | ✓ |
| React | N/A | ✓ |
| Framer | N/A | N/A |
| Adobe Creative Suite | ✓ | ✓ |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | N/A |
| After Effects | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: R/GA vs Ramotion
| Criterion | R/GA | Ramotion |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | $25K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Retainer | Fixed project, Time & materials |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: R/GA vs Ramotion
| Dimension | R/GA | Ramotion |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Enterprise transformation, Consumer products, Media & entertainment | SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products |
| Best use cases | Consumer platform redesign tied to a brand relaunch, Enterprise digital product with a marketing/campaign component | Brand identity plus product design bundle for a startup, Website and mobile app redesign for a mid-market company |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
R/GA vs Ramotion: pros and cons
| R/GA | |
|---|---|
| + | Combines product design with marketing and brand strategy, useful for clients needing both from one vendor |
| + | Ten-country presence spans North America, Europe, Latin America, and APAC |
| + | Nearly five decades of case studies and enterprise brand relationships |
| + | Now independently owned following the March 2025 buyout, after 23 years inside Interpublic Group |
| - | Still stabilizing operationally after a recent (2025) private-equity-backed ownership change |
| - | Marketing-first positioning means less pure product-design specialization than boutique companies |
| - | Scale and pricing suit large-brand budgets more than early-stage product teams |
| Ramotion | |
|---|---|
| + | 16 continuous years in operation since 2009 |
| + | Combines brand identity with product design and app development inside one team |
| + | Serves both early-stage startups and Fortune 500 clients, offering flexible scale |
| + | Three US offices (San Francisco, Los Angeles, New York) |
| - | Team size is genuinely disputed (company states 70+, trackers report as low as ~29) — worth clarifying before signing |
| - | $25K minimum engagement (per company website; independently unverifiable) sits mid-tier, not the most accessible in this list |
| - | Broad brand-plus-product positioning trades off some depth against product-only specialists |
Who should choose R/GA?
R/GA is the right choice for large consumer or enterprise brands wanting product design bundled with marketing-led brand strategy..
Fuses product design with marketing and brand strategy under one roof, now independent after its 2025 buyout from IPG. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Enterprise transformation, Consumer products, Media & entertainment.
Who should choose Ramotion?
Ramotion is the right choice for startups and mid-market companies wanting brand identity and product design bundled into one engagement..
Combines brand identity work with UX/UI and app development for clients ranging from startups to Fortune 500. Minimum engagement starts at $25K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products.
Decision matrix: R/GA vs Ramotion
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | R/GA |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: R/GA (Not published) vs Ramotion ($25K (per company website; independently unverifiable)) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | R/GA |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: R/GA vs Ramotion
| Use case | R/GA fit | Ramotion fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer platform redesign tied to a brand relaunch | Strong | Limited | R/GA |
| Enterprise digital product with a marketing/campaign component | Strong | Limited | R/GA |
| Brand identity plus product design bundle for a startup | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Website and mobile app redesign for a mid-market company | Limited | Strong | Ramotion |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: R/GA vs Ramotion
Ramotion (4.0/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. Combines brand identity work with UX/UI and app development for clients ranging from startups to Fortune 500. It is best for startups and mid-market companies wanting brand identity and product design bundled into one engagement..
R/GA (3.7/5) is the better choice when large consumer or enterprise brands wanting product design bundled with marketing-led brand strategy.. If your situation matches those criteria, R/GA is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
R/GA vs Ramotion FAQ
Is R/GA better than Ramotion?
Ramotion (4.0/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. R/GA is better for large consumer or enterprise brands wanting product design bundled with marketing-led brand strategy.. Ramotion is better for startups and mid-market companies wanting brand identity and product design bundled into one engagement..
How do R/GA and Ramotion differ in pricing?
R/GA uses project-based, retainer for ongoing programs pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Ramotion uses fixed project, t&m pricing with a minimum engagement of $25K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: R/GA or Ramotion?
Ramotion is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between R/GA and Ramotion?
R/GA's primary differentiator is: fuses product design with marketing and brand strategy under one roof, now independent after its 2025 buyout from ipg. Ramotion's primary differentiator is: combines brand identity work with ux/ui and app development for clients ranging from startups to fortune 500. They also differ in team size (~2,000 vs 29–70+ (company states 70+ experts; third-party trackers report lower core headcount)), minimum engagement (Not published vs $25K (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (Enterprise transformation, Consumer products vs SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.