Nomensa vs Gapsy Studio: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Gapsy Studio (4.5/5) edges ahead of Nomensa (3.9/5) overall. Gapsy Studio is the better choice for Fintech, SaaS, healthcare — perfect-rated boutique. Nomensa is the stronger option for Government, banking, healthcare — accessibility built in. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Nomensa vs Gapsy Studio: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Nomensa | Gapsy Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2001 | 2014 |
| HQ | Bristol, UK (also London and Amsterdam) | Dnipro, Ukraine |
| Team size | 100+ | Collective model, size not published (500+ completed projects) |
| Rating | 3.9 / 5 | 4.5 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Built around accessibility and psychology-informed UX from its 2001 founding, now one of Europe's largest specialist UX agencies at 100+ people | A perfect 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews, backed by 13+ international awards, from a company that doesn't publish its own headcount |
| Pricing model | Project-based (not published) | Fixed project, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not published | $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, Sketch, Adobe Creative Suite | Figma, Webflow, After Effects |
| Industries served | Financial services / fintech, Healthcare, EdTech | Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software, Healthcare, EdTech, E-commerce / retail |
Nomensa vs Gapsy Studio: overview
Nomensa
Simon Norris, Sally Lincoln, and Alastair Campbell founded Nomensa in 2001 around a specific combination: psychology, user-centered design, and accessibility. Now running from Bristol, London, and Amsterdam with 100+ people, the company calls itself one of Europe's largest specialist UX agencies, serving banking, e-commerce, education, entertainment, government, and healthcare clients. Accessibility isn't an add-on service here — auditing, testing, training, and consultancy sit alongside standard UX design work.
Gapsy Studio
Gapsy Studio describes its own history as running "since 2014" — treated here as self-reported since it isn't independently confirmed — from Dnipro, Ukraine. Rather than stating a headcount, the company calls itself a "collective of creative professionals," pointing to 500+ completed projects and a 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews instead. Thirteen-plus international awards from Behance, Awwwards, FWA, CSS Winner, Titan Awards, and DesignRush back that rating, spanning fintech, SaaS, health, education, and retail work.
Services and capabilities: Nomensa vs Gapsy Studio
| Capability | Nomensa | Gapsy Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✓ | ✗ |
| Branding | ✓ | ✓ |
| Web development | ✗ | ✓ |
| Mobile development | ✗ | ✓ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Nomensa vs Gapsy Studio
| Framework / platform | Nomensa | Gapsy Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | N/A | ✓ |
| React | N/A | ✓ |
| Framer | N/A | N/A |
| Adobe Creative Suite | ✓ | N/A |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | N/A |
| After Effects | N/A | ✓ |
Pricing comparison: Nomensa vs Gapsy Studio
| Criterion | Nomensa | Gapsy Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Retainer | Fixed project, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Nomensa vs Gapsy Studio
| Dimension | Nomensa | Gapsy Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Financial services / fintech, Healthcare, EdTech | Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software, Healthcare |
| Best use cases | Government or public-sector digital accessibility compliance, Banking or healthcare UX requiring built-in accessibility auditing | Fintech app UI/UX with brand identity work, Healthcare or EdTech product redesign |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Nomensa vs Gapsy Studio: pros and cons
| Nomensa | |
|---|---|
| + | Accessibility expertise built into the practice since 2001, not added later as a compliance afterthought |
| + | 100+ people across Bristol, London, and Amsterdam is a genuinely large specialist UX team |
| + | Serves banking, e-commerce, education, government, and healthcare — sectors where accessibility compliance matters most |
| + | Independently founded and still operating under its original leadership focus |
| - | Accessibility-and-psychology specialization may be a narrower fit for clients whose priority is pure visual design |
| - | Pricing and minimum engagement size aren't published |
| - | European office footprint (Bristol, London, Amsterdam) offers less overlap with US or APAC business hours |
| Gapsy Studio | |
|---|---|
| + | 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 public reviews — one of the highest verified scores in this list |
| + | 13+ international design awards across Behance, Awwwards, FWA, CSS Winner, Titan Awards, and DesignRush |
| + | 500+ completed projects demonstrates a substantial delivery track record |
| + | Covers five distinct industries (fintech, SaaS, health, education, retail) from one team |
| - | Doesn't publish a specific headcount, describing itself as a 'collective' — harder to gauge delivery capacity |
| - | Founding year is self-reported ('since 2014') rather than independently confirmed |
| - | Its broad five-industry positioning trades off some depth against single-vertical specialists like UXDA |
Who should choose Nomensa?
A typical fit: government or public-sector digital accessibility compliance.
Built around accessibility and psychology-informed UX from its 2001 founding, now one of Europe's largest specialist UX agencies at 100+ people. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Financial services / fintech, Healthcare, EdTech.
Who should choose Gapsy Studio?
A typical fit: fintech app UI/UX with brand identity work.
A perfect 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews, backed by 13+ international awards, from a company that doesn't publish its own headcount. Minimum engagement starts at $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software, Healthcare, EdTech, E-commerce / retail.
Decision matrix: Nomensa vs Gapsy Studio
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Nomensa |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Gapsy Studio |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Nomensa (Not published) vs Gapsy Studio ($10K (per company website; independently unverifiable)) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Gapsy Studio |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Nomensa vs Gapsy Studio
| Use case | Nomensa fit | Gapsy Studio fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Government or public-sector digital accessibility compliance | Strong | Limited | Nomensa |
| Banking or healthcare UX requiring built-in accessibility auditing | Strong | Limited | Nomensa |
| Fintech app UI/UX with brand identity work | Limited | Strong | Gapsy Studio |
| Healthcare or EdTech product redesign | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Nomensa vs Gapsy Studio
Gapsy Studio (4.5/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. A perfect 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews, backed by 13+ international awards, from a company that doesn't publish its own headcount.
Nomensa (3.9/5) is worth a look if you need banking or healthcare UX requiring built-in accessibility auditing. If your situation matches that, Nomensa is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Nomensa vs Gapsy Studio FAQ
Is Nomensa better than Gapsy Studio?
Gapsy Studio (4.5/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Nomensa's strongest advantage: accessibility expertise built into the practice since 2001, not added later as a compliance afterthought. Gapsy Studio's strongest advantage: 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 public reviews — one of the highest verified scores in this list.
How do Nomensa and Gapsy Studio differ in pricing?
Nomensa uses project-based (not published) pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Gapsy Studio uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Nomensa or Gapsy Studio?
Gapsy Studio is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Nomensa and Gapsy Studio?
Nomensa's primary differentiator is: built around accessibility and psychology-informed UX from its 2001 founding, now one of Europe's largest specialist UX agencies at 100+ people. Gapsy Studio's primary differentiator is: a perfect 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews, backed by 13+ international awards, from a company that doesn't publish its own headcount. They also differ in team size (100+ vs Collective model, size not published (500+ completed projects)), minimum engagement (Not published vs $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (Financial services / fintech, Healthcare vs Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.