Top Product Design Companies

Huge Inc vs Clearleft: full comparison for 2026

Quick verdict

Clearleft (4.0/5) edges ahead of Huge Inc (3.6/5) overall. Clearleft is the better choice for UK/EU orgs, independently owned UX consultancy. Huge Inc is the stronger option for large brands, big agency mid-ownership-transition. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.

Huge Inc vs Clearleft: head-to-head summary

Criterion Huge Inc Clearleft
Founded 1999 2005
HQ Manhattan, NYC, USA (relocated from Brooklyn Oct 2025) Brighton, UK
Team size ~1,240 Not published
Rating 3.6 / 5 4.0 / 5
Primary differentiator One of the largest, longest-running digital companies in this list, now merged with Hero Digital under AEA Investors One of the first dedicated UX agencies in Europe (2005), still independently owned two decades later, with 100+ clients across five continents
Pricing model Project-based, retainer Project-based (not published)
Min. engagement Not published Not published
Primary tech stack Figma, Adobe Creative Suite, React Figma, Sketch, Miro
Industries served Enterprise transformation, Consumer products Financial services / fintech, Enterprise transformation, Media & entertainment

Huge Inc vs Clearleft: overview

Huge Inc

Huge started in Brooklyn in 1999 under David Skokna, Sasha Kirovski, Gene Liebel, and Aaron Shapiro, spending most of its life inside Interpublic Group. AEA Investors bought the agency in December 2024 and merged it with Hero Digital; a relocation to Manhattan followed in October 2025. Post-merger headcount sits around 1,240, with engagement sizes that follow large-agency norms rather than a published rate.

Clearleft

Andy Budd, Richard Rutter, and Jeremy Keith started Clearleft in Brighton, UK in 2005, at a point when "UX agency" barely existed as a category in Europe. Two decades later the company has worked with 100+ clients across five continents — Virgin Holidays, Channel 4, Penguin Random House, and public-sector clients like Brighton & Hove City Council among them — spanning user research, service design, prototyping, and front-end engineering. Unlike several names in this list, Clearleft has stayed independently owned since founding.

Services and capabilities: Huge Inc vs Clearleft

Capability Huge Inc Clearleft
Product design
UX research
Branding
Web development
Mobile development
Design systems

Tech stack comparison: Huge Inc vs Clearleft

Framework / platform Huge Inc Clearleft
Figma
Webflow N/A
React N/A
Framer N/A N/A
Adobe Creative Suite
Design systems/Storybook N/A N/A
After Effects N/A N/A

Pricing comparison: Huge Inc vs Clearleft

Criterion Huge Inc Clearleft
Minimum engagement Not published Not published
Engagement models Fixed project, Retainer Fixed project, Retainer
Rate transparency Minimum disclosed Minimum disclosed
Price tier Mid-market Mid-market

Target audience comparison: Huge Inc vs Clearleft

Dimension Huge Inc Clearleft
Best company size Startup to mid-market Startup to mid-market
Best industries Enterprise transformation, Consumer products Financial services / fintech, Enterprise transformation, Media & entertainment
Best use cases Enterprise brand and digital product redesign, Large-scale web platform modernization UK or European enterprise UX research and service design, Public-sector digital service design
Typical project type Fixed project Fixed project

Huge Inc vs Clearleft: pros and cons

Huge Inc
+ 26 years of enterprise digital design history and case studies
+ Post-merger headcount (~1,240) supports significant delivery capacity
+ Covers brand, product, and web design/development under one roof
+ Recent Hero Digital merger brings additional capabilities into the brand
- Sold to private equity firm AEA Investors in December 2024 and merged with Hero Digital — a recent ownership change still settling
- Long tenure inside Interpublic Group followed by a 2024 sale means less continuity than an independently owned company
- Engagement sizes aren't published, complicating budget planning for smaller teams
Clearleft
+ One of the earliest dedicated UX agencies in Europe, founded in 2005
+ Independently owned for two decades, unlike several acquired names in this list
+ 100+ clients across five continents, spanning financial services, government, media, and technology
+ Service range covers user research, service design, prototyping, and front-end engineering
- Team size isn't published in available sources, making capacity planning harder without a direct conversation
- UK-based office footprint offers less multi-region coverage than global agency networks
- Pricing and minimum engagement size aren't published

Who should choose Huge Inc?

A typical fit: enterprise brand and digital product redesign.

One of the largest, longest-running digital companies in this list, now merged with Hero Digital under AEA Investors. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Enterprise transformation, Consumer products.

Who should choose Clearleft?

A typical fit: UK or European enterprise UX research and service design.

One of the first dedicated UX agencies in Europe (2005), still independently owned two decades later, with 100+ clients across five continents. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Financial services / fintech, Enterprise transformation, Media & entertainment.

Decision matrix: Huge Inc vs Clearleft

Your situation Recommended choice
You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope Huge Inc
You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme Check each company's engagement model
Your budget is at the lower end Compare: Huge Inc (Not published) vs Clearleft (Not published)
You need specialist depth in a specific vertical Clearleft
You need staff augmentation or team extension Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug
You need consulting before committing to a build Both may offer discovery engagements

Use case fit: Huge Inc vs Clearleft

Use case Huge Inc fit Clearleft fit Winner
Enterprise brand and digital product redesign Strong Strong Both equally
Large-scale web platform modernization Strong Limited Huge Inc
UK or European enterprise UX research and service design Limited Strong Clearleft
Public-sector digital service design Limited Strong Clearleft
Fixed-price product build Limited Limited Both equally
Dedicated design team augmentation Limited Limited Both equally

Verdict: Huge Inc vs Clearleft

Clearleft (4.0/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. One of the first dedicated UX agencies in Europe (2005), still independently owned two decades later, with 100+ clients across five continents.

Huge Inc (3.6/5) is worth a look if you need large-scale web platform modernization. If your situation matches that, Huge Inc is a competitive option.

Related comparisons

Huge Inc vs Clearleft FAQ

Is Huge Inc better than Clearleft?

Clearleft (4.0/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Huge Inc's strongest advantage: 26 years of enterprise digital design history and case studies. Clearleft's strongest advantage: one of the earliest dedicated UX agencies in Europe, founded in 2005.

How do Huge Inc and Clearleft differ in pricing?

Huge Inc uses project-based, retainer pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Clearleft uses project-based (not published) pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.

Which is better for enterprise: Huge Inc or Clearleft?

Huge Inc is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.

What are the main differences between Huge Inc and Clearleft?

Huge Inc's primary differentiator is: one of the largest, longest-running digital companies in this list, now merged with Hero Digital under AEA Investors. Clearleft's primary differentiator is: one of the first dedicated UX agencies in Europe (2005), still independently owned two decades later, with 100+ clients across five continents. They also differ in team size (~1,240 vs Not published), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Enterprise transformation, Consumer products vs Financial services / fintech, Enterprise transformation).

Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.