Fresh Consulting vs Fireart Studio: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Fireart Studio (4.4/5) edges ahead of Fresh Consulting (3.8/5) overall. Fireart Studio is the better choice for Startups/mid-market, design plus full development. Fresh Consulting is the stronger option for Hardware/robotics product design alongside software UX. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Fresh Consulting vs Fireart Studio: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Fresh Consulting | Fireart Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 2013 |
| HQ | Bellevue, WA, USA | Warsaw, Poland (Ukraine-founded roots) |
| Team size | 150+ | 100–150+ |
| Rating | 3.8 / 5 | 4.4 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Combines industrial design and hardware engineering (robotics, medical equipment) with software UX at 150+ person scale | 700+ delivered projects for 200+ clients backed by an independently-verified 'Leading UX Design Team' Clutch recognition |
| Pricing model | Project-based (not published) | Fixed project, dedicated team, T&M |
| Min. engagement | Not published | $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, CAD tools, React | Figma, React, Next.js |
| Industries served | Healthcare, Consumer products, Enterprise transformation | SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products |
Fresh Consulting vs Fireart Studio: overview
Fresh Consulting
Fresh Consulting has run out of Bellevue, Washington since 2007, growing to 150+ specialists spanning industrial design, UX, strategy, and engineering. That combination shows up in its project list: a robotic arm accelerated to launch for Ally Robotics, a first-of-its-kind robotic air hockey table built with Microsoft AI. The company's work spans medical, robotic, and industrial equipment alongside standard consumer and software product design — a physical-plus-digital range shared by only a handful of names in this list.
Fireart Studio
Fireart Studio's story starts in Ukraine in 2013 and continues today from Warsaw, Poland, having scaled from a single founder to 150+ people over a decade. Clutch calls it a "Leading UX Design Team"; DesignRush and The Manifest have separately named it a Top Graphic Design Company. Behind those labels: 700+ delivered projects for 200+ clients, with product design and full software development handled inside the same team.
Services and capabilities: Fresh Consulting vs Fireart Studio
| Capability | Fresh Consulting | Fireart Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✗ | ✓ |
| Branding | ✗ | ✗ |
| Web development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile development | ✗ | ✓ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Fresh Consulting vs Fireart Studio
| Framework / platform | Fresh Consulting | Fireart Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | N/A | N/A |
| React | ✓ | ✓ |
| Framer | N/A | N/A |
| Adobe Creative Suite | N/A | ✓ |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | N/A |
| After Effects | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Fresh Consulting vs Fireart Studio
| Criterion | Fresh Consulting | Fireart Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team | Fixed project, Dedicated team, Time & materials |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Fresh Consulting vs Fireart Studio
| Dimension | Fresh Consulting | Fireart Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Healthcare, Consumer products, Enterprise transformation | SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products |
| Best use cases | Robotics or industrial-equipment product design and engineering, Medical device UX and hardware design | End-to-end SaaS product design and development, Startup MVP design and build |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Fresh Consulting vs Fireart Studio: pros and cons
| Fresh Consulting | |
|---|---|
| + | 150+ specialists spanning industrial design, UX, strategy, and engineering under one roof |
| + | Client work spans medical, robotic, and industrial equipment alongside consumer software |
| + | Named projects (Ally Robotics, Microsoft AI robotic air hockey table) demonstrate genuine hardware engineering capability |
| + | Nearly two decades of continuous operation since 2007 |
| - | Hardware-and-robotics emphasis may be a narrower fit for clients needing pure software/UI work |
| - | Pricing and minimum engagement size aren't published |
| - | Single primary office location (Bellevue) offers less multi-region delivery than larger networks |
| Fireart Studio | |
|---|---|
| + | 700+ delivered projects for 200+ clients over 12 years is one of the deepest track records among boutiques here |
| + | Clutch-recognized 'Leading UX Design Team,' plus Top Graphic Design Company nods from DesignRush and The Manifest |
| + | Grew from 1 to 150+ people while retaining a single-studio, boutique culture |
| + | Pairs product design with full software development, cutting hand-off risk |
| - | Relocated its HQ from Ukraine to Warsaw amid regional instability — worth noting for delivery-continuity planning |
| - | $20K minimum engagement (per company website; independently unverifiable) is mid-tier, not the cheapest option in this list |
| - | Development-heavy focus means marginally less pure design specialization than research-only companies |
Who should choose Fresh Consulting?
A typical fit: robotics or industrial-equipment product design and engineering.
Combines industrial design and hardware engineering (robotics, medical equipment) with software UX at 150+ person scale. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Healthcare, Consumer products, Enterprise transformation.
Who should choose Fireart Studio?
A typical fit: end-to-end SaaS product design and development.
700+ delivered projects for 200+ clients backed by an independently-verified 'Leading UX Design Team' Clutch recognition. Minimum engagement starts at $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products.
Decision matrix: Fresh Consulting vs Fireart Studio
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Fresh Consulting |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Fresh Consulting |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Fresh Consulting (Not published) vs Fireart Studio ($20K (per company website; independently unverifiable)) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Fresh Consulting |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Fresh Consulting vs Fireart Studio
| Use case | Fresh Consulting fit | Fireart Studio fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Robotics or industrial-equipment product design and engineering | Strong | Limited | Fresh Consulting |
| Medical device UX and hardware design | Strong | Limited | Fresh Consulting |
| End-to-end SaaS product design and development | Limited | Strong | Fireart Studio |
| Startup MVP design and build | Limited | Strong | Fireart Studio |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Fresh Consulting vs Fireart Studio
Fireart Studio (4.4/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. 700+ delivered projects for 200+ clients backed by an independently-verified 'Leading UX Design Team' Clutch recognition.
Fresh Consulting (3.8/5) is worth a look if you need medical device UX and hardware design. If your situation matches that, Fresh Consulting is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Fresh Consulting vs Fireart Studio FAQ
Is Fresh Consulting better than Fireart Studio?
Fireart Studio (4.4/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Fresh Consulting's strongest advantage: 150+ specialists spanning industrial design, UX, strategy, and engineering under one roof. Fireart Studio's strongest advantage: 700+ delivered projects for 200+ clients over 12 years is one of the deepest track records among boutiques here.
How do Fresh Consulting and Fireart Studio differ in pricing?
Fresh Consulting uses project-based (not published) pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Fireart Studio uses fixed project, dedicated team, t&m pricing with a minimum engagement of $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Fresh Consulting or Fireart Studio?
Fireart Studio is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Fresh Consulting and Fireart Studio?
Fresh Consulting's primary differentiator is: combines industrial design and hardware engineering (robotics, medical equipment) with software UX at 150+ person scale. Fireart Studio's primary differentiator is: 700+ delivered projects for 200+ clients backed by an independently-verified 'Leading UX Design Team' Clutch recognition. They also differ in team size (150+ vs 100–150+), minimum engagement (Not published vs $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (Healthcare, Consumer products vs SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.