Cyber-Duck vs Fireart Studio: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Fireart Studio (4.4/5) edges ahead of Cyber-Duck (3.7/5) overall. Fireart Studio is the better choice for Startups/mid-market, design plus full development. Cyber-Duck is the stronger option for public-sector UK orgs, proven public-trust client list. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Cyber-Duck vs Fireart Studio: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Cyber-Duck | Fireart Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2005 | 2013 |
| HQ | Elstree, Hertfordshire, UK | Warsaw, Poland (Ukraine-founded roots) |
| Team size | 90+ | 100–150+ |
| Rating | 3.7 / 5 | 4.4 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | A UX and development practice built on public-sector and regulated-industry trust (Bank of England, Cancer Research UK, GOV.UK), now backed by CACI | 700+ delivered projects for 200+ clients backed by an independently-verified 'Leading UX Design Team' Clutch recognition |
| Pricing model | Project-based (not published) | Fixed project, dedicated team, T&M |
| Min. engagement | Not published | $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, Sketch, React | Figma, React, Next.js |
| Industries served | Financial services / fintech, Healthcare, Enterprise transformation | SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products |
Cyber-Duck vs Fireart Studio: overview
Cyber-Duck
Danny Bluestone founded Cyber-Duck in 2005 in Elstree, Hertfordshire, building a UX and software development practice that grew to 90+ staff across the UK and Europe before CACI acquired it, an ownership change worth disclosing. Client relationships include the Bank of England, Cancer Research UK, GOV.UK Verify partner CitizenSafe, the Commonwealth of Nations, Sport England, and Mitsubishi Electric — a client list skewed toward public-sector and regulated-industry work.
Fireart Studio
Fireart Studio's story starts in Ukraine in 2013 and continues today from Warsaw, Poland, having scaled from a single founder to 150+ people over a decade. Clutch calls it a "Leading UX Design Team"; DesignRush and The Manifest have separately named it a Top Graphic Design Company. Behind those labels: 700+ delivered projects for 200+ clients, with product design and full software development handled inside the same team.
Services and capabilities: Cyber-Duck vs Fireart Studio
| Capability | Cyber-Duck | Fireart Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✓ | ✓ |
| Branding | ✗ | ✗ |
| Web development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile development | ✗ | ✓ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Cyber-Duck vs Fireart Studio
| Framework / platform | Cyber-Duck | Fireart Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | N/A | N/A |
| React | ✓ | ✓ |
| Framer | N/A | N/A |
| Adobe Creative Suite | ✓ | ✓ |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | N/A |
| After Effects | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Cyber-Duck vs Fireart Studio
| Criterion | Cyber-Duck | Fireart Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Retainer | Fixed project, Dedicated team, Time & materials |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Cyber-Duck vs Fireart Studio
| Dimension | Cyber-Duck | Fireart Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Financial services / fintech, Healthcare, Enterprise transformation | SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products |
| Best use cases | Government or public-sector digital service UX, Regulated-industry (banking, healthcare charity) product design | End-to-end SaaS product design and development, Startup MVP design and build |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Cyber-Duck vs Fireart Studio: pros and cons
| Cyber-Duck | |
|---|---|
| + | Client list (Bank of England, Cancer Research UK, GOV.UK Verify, Commonwealth of Nations) demonstrates genuine public-sector trust |
| + | 90+ staff across the UK and Europe supports mid-size delivery capacity |
| + | Two decades of continuous operation since 2005 |
| + | CACI acquisition provides access to a larger UK consulting and data-analytics organization |
| - | Acquired by CACI — no longer an independently owned agency, worth disclosing to prospective clients |
| - | Public-sector-heavy client list may be a less direct fit for consumer or startup-stage clients |
| - | Pricing and minimum engagement size aren't published |
| Fireart Studio | |
|---|---|
| + | 700+ delivered projects for 200+ clients over 12 years is one of the deepest track records among boutiques here |
| + | Clutch-recognized 'Leading UX Design Team,' plus Top Graphic Design Company nods from DesignRush and The Manifest |
| + | Grew from 1 to 150+ people while retaining a single-studio, boutique culture |
| + | Pairs product design with full software development, cutting hand-off risk |
| - | Relocated its HQ from Ukraine to Warsaw amid regional instability — worth noting for delivery-continuity planning |
| - | $20K minimum engagement (per company website; independently unverifiable) is mid-tier, not the cheapest option in this list |
| - | Development-heavy focus means marginally less pure design specialization than research-only companies |
Who should choose Cyber-Duck?
A typical fit: government or public-sector digital service UX.
A UX and development practice built on public-sector and regulated-industry trust (Bank of England, Cancer Research UK, GOV.UK), now backed by CACI. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Financial services / fintech, Healthcare, Enterprise transformation.
Who should choose Fireart Studio?
A typical fit: end-to-end SaaS product design and development.
700+ delivered projects for 200+ clients backed by an independently-verified 'Leading UX Design Team' Clutch recognition. Minimum engagement starts at $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products.
Decision matrix: Cyber-Duck vs Fireart Studio
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Cyber-Duck |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Fireart Studio |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Cyber-Duck (Not published) vs Fireart Studio ($20K (per company website; independently unverifiable)) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Cyber-Duck |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Cyber-Duck vs Fireart Studio
| Use case | Cyber-Duck fit | Fireart Studio fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Government or public-sector digital service UX | Strong | Limited | Cyber-Duck |
| Regulated-industry (banking, healthcare charity) product design | Strong | Limited | Cyber-Duck |
| End-to-end SaaS product design and development | Limited | Strong | Fireart Studio |
| Startup MVP design and build | Limited | Strong | Fireart Studio |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Cyber-Duck vs Fireart Studio
Fireart Studio (4.4/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. 700+ delivered projects for 200+ clients backed by an independently-verified 'Leading UX Design Team' Clutch recognition.
Cyber-Duck (3.7/5) is worth a look if you need regulated-industry (banking, healthcare charity) product design. If your situation matches that, Cyber-Duck is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Cyber-Duck vs Fireart Studio FAQ
Is Cyber-Duck better than Fireart Studio?
Fireart Studio (4.4/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Cyber-Duck's strongest advantage: client list (Bank of England, Cancer Research UK, GOV.UK Verify, Commonwealth of Nations) demonstrates genuine public-sector trust. Fireart Studio's strongest advantage: 700+ delivered projects for 200+ clients over 12 years is one of the deepest track records among boutiques here.
How do Cyber-Duck and Fireart Studio differ in pricing?
Cyber-Duck uses project-based (not published) pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Fireart Studio uses fixed project, dedicated team, t&m pricing with a minimum engagement of $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Cyber-Duck or Fireart Studio?
Fireart Studio is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Cyber-Duck and Fireart Studio?
Cyber-Duck's primary differentiator is: a UX and development practice built on public-sector and regulated-industry trust (Bank of England, Cancer Research UK, GOV.UK), now backed by CACI. Fireart Studio's primary differentiator is: 700+ delivered projects for 200+ clients backed by an independently-verified 'Leading UX Design Team' Clutch recognition. They also differ in team size (90+ vs 100–150+), minimum engagement (Not published vs $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (Financial services / fintech, Healthcare vs SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.